Musk suggests that it is much better to reason from “first
principle” to achieve genuine breakthroughs.
Musk’s Physics background shows very clearly here. When examining any issue or problem one needs
to step back and start from the most basic/fundamental truths we know about the
way things work. This drives the examination of all assumptions and looks for
solutions that align with these fundamental truths. Look for solutions not tied
to an existing solution but start from the most basic principles we know to be
true.
He uses the issue of battery packs for electric vehicles as
an example. Since battery packs have always been expensive to make; most
thought about how to improve them has started from the unexamined assumption
that they will always be essentially like that (reason by analogy). Alternatively, starting from “first
principle” one asks what are the basis properties of the battery materials? What might make them more effective? How can
we procure these elements in a less costly way? What basic truths about the
manufacture of these packs could reduce manufacturing costs? What other
elements could be used? Questions like these, not tied to assumptions about something
that already exists, is fertile ground for breakthrough development.Saturday, September 8, 2012
For breakthrough creativity- it is best to reason from “first principle”
In an interview with Elon Musk (founder of PayPal and Tesla
Motors) done by Kevin Rose there is a great nugget of wisdom about genuine
creativity and entrepreneurship. Musk observes that most people reason from
“analogy” (this is in some way analogous to that). This means that most innovation is just next
step iteration and not break-through development. By starting with something
that “is” one assumes a whole range of assumptions and limitations that almost always
go unexamined. By its very nature reasoning
by “analogy” limits our range of solution space.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment